Interlocking tiles are also available as rubber pavers, which are made from recycled rubber and are very non-slip. They are cheaper than stone, but cost more than concrete pavers. But they are friendlier on their feet and respectful of the environment. The compressive strength of IPB samples subjected to the grounding hardening process is shown in Figure 5. In the figure, it can be seen that unlike other curing methods, the compressive strength is approximately the same after 28 days and 56 days.
Once installed, using block paving for your garden yard requires very little maintenance. The color remains the same as no additional color Paving Companies Athens, Alabama is needed in the coming years. The use of paving stones in the garden or in the driveway withstands British weather like regular rain.
Usually, the shape is square or rectangular, but other shapes are also available, e.B. Bricks create a very attractive classic paving surface that works well with almost any style of living. Brick paving is a much more attractive paving surface than poured concrete, but compared to concrete paving stones, the design options are more limited. Bricks can be arranged in different patterns, but the sizes are all rectangular and the colors are limited to browns and reds. Concrete pavers, on the other hand, are available in a variety of shapes and sizes, giving you more flexibility.
The pond method proved to be the optimal curing method, as it led to the highest compressive strength. The compressive strength of cured IPB using curing methods other than hot water curing is shown in Figure 8. Comparing the compressive strength achieved with different curing methods after 7 days, it can be observed that those cured with the pond method are the highest.
The compressive strength of 7 days of samples cured by the waterlogging method is 35.8%, 19.7% and 6.37%, respectively, higher than that of the sprinkler and membrane outdoors. It can be observed that the compressive strength of the samples cured with the membrane method is closer to that of the pond method. The higher compressive strength of the membrane method compared to the outdoor method and spraying is due to a lower water content lost during curing in the atmosphere. Therefore, the membrane process is suitable in applications where waterlogging processes are not possible or economical. Similar to the compressive strength of 7 days, the use of the waterlogging method for curing resulted in higher compressive strength after 56 days. However, the use of the spray and membrane method resulted in higher compressive strength than the open and grounding method.